We had our Bi-annual Town Meeting yesterday( for those who don't have this , we elect representatives for a town meeting (think congress in a much smaller but SMARTER instance) and we meet twice a year to discuss and vote on matters in our town( budgets, bylaws etc...) Yesterday was our spring town meeting. We had a number of the usual questions that appear every year (allocate this, approve that. Basically housekeeping articles.) and a few important ones. a Camping bylaw that would make homelessness a felony if carried far enough-failed. An article regarding allowing LTC(license to carry) gun owners permission to carry in our municipal buildings-FAILED resoundingly.(to my surprise given our gun culture here) and an amendment to trim the other town dept's budgets to fund our school system shortfalls--this also failed.
I did not support the camping question because we are short of resources in our town and it placed a demand on the police to maintain patrols of the known area of campsites the homeless have created. During the discussion it was divulged the town has exceptional programs in place to house the homeless and in fact have currently reduced the homeless to Zero or almost zero. The question would have created civil fines that the homeless cannot pay and taken to the extreme would had led to jail if the fines were allowed to lapse. Homelessness should not be a crime anywhere. A lot of us are a major illness away from joining them given the soaring costs associated with medical procedures.
I did not support the Gun question because of public safety. The employees of the town when polled (even though a slight majority were LTC) - they did not want guns in municipal buildings. Municipal buildings in our town are a 9-iron away from public schools and their facilities in fact the Town hall is surrounded by the middle school on one side, athletic fields behind and the Stadium of the 3rd side. There was talk that the building itself belonged to the school dept since it had originally been a school.
The school question. I supported it even though I knew it would fail. I believe the gentleman had the right idea but the chainsaw approach was wrong much like Musk. Forcing the town depts going forward to maintain a percentage increase equal or less to the schools would certainly be a start. Does it solve the problem? no but it does make unappetizing solutions a little more palatable.
The problem is Prop 2 1/2. in its concept to force town government to stay within a 2.5 % annual increase of growth. This eases the strain somewhat on the homeowners. Well it does not take into account of all things Inflation and Insurance costs whose annual increases far exceed those of inflation. In the past 20 years we have seen this town get lean. Very lean with cost cutting. we don't pay comparable salaries, offer lousy benefits and as a result the turnback's our administration boast of are simply salaried budgeted for unfilled positions. Great system. we have turned off streetlights, we now pay for trash and bags, everything to do in town hall comes with a fee. before much longer the bathrooms will charge a quarter. Nickel and dimed to death?. More like $25 and $50.
That's the town we decided we wanted because God forbid we pay more in property taxes. We pay convenience fees. Use a service-pay a fee. Downside is children in school, the service of Public Education. I have no problem paying my share of public education. I fully support education and those who provide the service. These kids are our future. My 4 kids went through the system and three graduated college and the last works fulltime for a government contractor. They received an excellent education but know that education is in danger because of short sightedness regarding money. Why build today what we can put off till tomorrow?. Well we can and we do. just remember that school that will cost 25 million next year will cost 30 million the year after and more the year after that. How long can we afford to wait to fund education?