Tuesday, October 22, 2024

Problems Native Americans face voting

                      Alot of the information for this post has come from here:

https://vote.narf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/obstacles_at_every_turn.pdf  

From:

https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/voting-for-all-americans-native-americans


"Native Americans, like all citizens of the United States, have the right to vote in federal, state and local elections. Native Americans may also vote in tribal elections and may have dual citizenship in two sovereign nations, the U.S. and their tribe.

For voting in federal, state and local elections, Native American voters, especially if they live on reservations, may face challenges distinct from those faced by others: rural locations, limited residential mail delivery, housing insecurity and more. These problems are not unique to Native Americans and policy choices that address these challenges often aid other voters as well. For instance, rural voters everywhere may face issues with postal service, and voters with limited literacy or English proficiency on and off reservations can benefit from plain-language elections materials."

 

 

In Obstacles at Every Turn: Barriers to Political Participation Faced by Native American Voters, NARF identifies challenges for Native American Voters, some of which we summarize here:

  • Geography: Traditional addresses give a number and a street name. When registering to vote, people are assigned to a voting precinct based on their home address. On reservations or in other rural areas, nontraditional addresses, or homes with no address at all, are common. Those living on Native American reservations may use a description for their address which may be hard for others to identify. Registering to vote is based on the geographic location of a home, and if that's hard to identify, it can be hard to get registered and for election officials to assign a voter to a precinct.
  • Housing insecurity: Because of poverty and the lack of housing on many reservations, nontraditional residences-couch surfing-are more common, again making voter registration harder. Some people don't have fixed addresses, or they don't feel they have a residence to list on the registration forms, which may discourage them from registering to vote.
  • Mail service: The U.S. Postal Service may not deliver mail to many Native American or Alaska Native homes due to nontraditional addresses and distance from towns or cities. Many of these voters may not reliably receive election materials, including absentee/mail ballots. Many Native Americans in rural areas use rented P.O. boxes for mail delivery and these P.O. boxes may be in short supply. Boxes are often shared, so ensuring that a ballot gets to the right person can be difficult. Mail delivery may take longer in rural areas. Longer postal transit time could mean absentee or mail ballots aren't returned to the election office in time to be counted.
  • Poor roads and vast distances: Unpaved roads may become impassable after bad weather, and the distances between voters and resources may be large. The Navajo Nation in the southwestern United States, for example, is approximately the size of West Virginia. In such circumstances, voters' P.O. boxes could easily be 20-40 miles from their homes, and county seats even further, so making a trip to town to get a ballot is hard. On some reservations, like the Duck Water Reservation in Nevada, traveling to an in-person voting location can be over 100 miles round trip. Some Standing Rock Sioux tribal members must travel over 50 miles to the nearest South Dakota Department of Motor Vehicles office where they might register to vote.
  • The digital divide: Broadband availability is often worse in rural regions, including tribal lands, than in other areas. Without reliable access to the internet, communications with election officials (such as online voter registration, online requests for absentee ballots and communications about missing ballots) can be difficult.
  • English fluency: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Mississippi, New Mexico, Nevada, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin have American Indian/Alaska Native populations with enough nonproficient English speakers that one or more Native languages are "covered" by section 203 of the Voting Rights Act. That means that in some jurisdictions, bilingual ballots and voting materials must be provided in Apache, Choctaw, Hopi, Inupiat, Navajo, Pueblo, Ute, Yup'ik or a catchall group for all other languages, according to the Department of Justice's most recent determination of covered languages from 2021. The next determination will be released in 2026.

Literacy: Like in other high-poverty communities, low literacy rates can be a common concern on Native American reservations. Making sure that voting materials and ballots are written in plain language can make a difference.

 

 

Policies that Affect Native American Voters

  • Mostly-mail voting: Eight states and D.C. have adopted all-mail voting; all but one are in the West, where the percentage of Native American voters is higher. With mostly mail voting, all voters are mailed a paper ballot to vote at home and may return their ballot through the mail or at a designated drop box or voter service center, though other in-person voting options may still be available. However, Native American voters may not have a mailbox or a fixed address and therefore getting a ballot in the mail may be difficult. Mail delivery times may be longer on tribal lands as well.
  • Reducing in-person voting: Some states that implemented mostly-mail voting have reduced in-person voting options to minimize costs. These decisions may impact Native American communities more than others. If early voting can be provided on the reservation, then voters can combine voting with other errands to the tribal headquarters. Some jurisdictions use mobile registration and voting stations to meet voters where they are.
  • Ballot collection laws: Laws that restrict who can collect and return voted ballots may have a disparate impact on Native American voters. In some tribal communities without access to residential mail delivery, limited access to transportation and a culture of sharing rides and errands, allowing someone besides the voter to return an absentee ballot can help facilitate voting.
  • Registration requirements: Requiring citizens who are registering to vote to show a document with a traditional mailing address may not be easy for some Native American voters. Allowing voters to register using the address of tribal headquarters (as is now possible in Washington state) or by identifying on a map where their residence is, and allowing a verbal description of an address are other options.
  • Forms of voter ID: In states with voter ID requirements for in-person voting, adding a tribal ID as an allowed form of identification is an option. Some tribal IDs do not include photos, or expiration dates, and accommodation for those could be made.

 

 Their seems to be no simple solutions but we have got to make changes. A one size fits all election system does not work in our country. We cant have 100% mail or voter ID because people will be excluded. We need a system that works for everyone not just the Have's but all the people in our country about the age of 18 who are eligible to vote. People shouldn't have to ride a horse 100 miles or more to cast a ballot. We continue to say your vote is your voice..well too many people have no voice and this must change.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public Internet access under attack.

The fund that pays out for millions of people to have internet access when normally they cant afford it is running out of money. The bill to reinstate the funding has bi-partisan support yet our Speaker wont allow it to come to vote. familiar refrain huh? I was "surfing the web" the other night as I'm prone to do on occasion and came across this story.  https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/29/tech/broadband-affordability-acp-rural-older-americans/index.html . The ACP or accessible connectivity program allows millions of people to connect to the internet who would not be able to by providing much needed funds to pay the bill. I read the article and several similar articles that seem to highlight a specific segment of the population at risk. numbers as high as one in five Americans benefit from this program. Why?...the Internet is a luxury.., they don't need it..Well 20 years ago I would agree. This is 2024, our entire society is now Internet based. If you had told me 25 years ago that very few people would have land line telephone service now , I would have scoffed but its difficult to find anyone without a cell phone. One benefit from Covid was the rushed adaptation to technology. When my daughter was born with special needs , a trip to "the big city" (about 60 miles away) was a monthly if not weekly event to see specialists. Now she sits at the dining room table with her laptop over the Internet talking to these same doctors who saved her life years ago. Universities offer classes online. I am working towards a master's degree over the Internet because of the distance to the University. School programs at major Universities are online. they wouldn't be possible without the Internet. The elderly have used the internet to keep in touch and keep up to date with their families around the world. they also use it for doctor's visit when no transportation is available. Facetime and other similar programs allow these people to stay in touch and stay active as their mobility decreases instead of staying home alone and sometimes forgotten. 

         The federal government has made literally dozens of promises to our indigenous peoples. between 30 and 40 percent of these its been estimated don't even have running water.

 

Now it seems that we are going backwards in yet another aspect. The Internet access being limited those who can afford it and limiting access to those who really need it. 


Update: As expected the republicans let the funding lapse.

Tired of this..

How did we get here?

         The question asked by "Lenny"(Steve Zahn) to "Guy Patterson" (Tom Everett Scott) in the movie "That thing you do" moments before a live TV broadcast. We dont live in a movie and neither of the candidates are Sparticus.

         Our Presidential race could be a movie but I doubt Hollywoods' screenwriters could write something like this. On one side we have the democrats who pushed the current president out of the race after a subpar debate performance which they felt jeopardized their election chances. Do I agree? I suppose yes but where were these people in the run up to the convention when it became apparent there was a problem? If Harris had been chosen months ago or vetted among other candidates the situation may be different. Water under the bridge. She is an excellent candidate and in another time , she would have swept to victory and who knows she still may.

       The Republicans: Where do I start. A congress that has done virtually nothing to benefit the American public despite legislation introduced that would have improved the lives of millions. Funding for hurricane relief is put off until "after the election" by the speaker because it would remove a campaign point the republicans are standing firmly on and possibly aid the democrats. Block legislation then condemn the democrats for doing nothing. Ingenuous. 

We have all seen the news clips from campaign stops by Trump. A stop in Latrobe PA , which was the hometown of my childhood idol Arnold Palmer featured a story regarding his genitalia. When did this become the norm?..Trump referred to Harris as a "SHIT Vice President" I don't ever remember seeing that. This only scraping the top of what has been said. We have devolved so far penis stories and profanity are accepted from a candidate for the highest office in the land with the explanation "That's Trump" . 

The Media has been of absolutely no help as incidents like these are either not reported or glossed over. For example Trump participated in a photo op at a closed McDonald's where Trump pretended to "work" cooking fries and handing food out the window to pre-selected "customers" (trump supporters) and asking predetermined questions. This was done because Harris said her first job was at a Mcdonalds franchise but couldn't produced a w2 from over 40 years ago to prove it. I really think no one could produce one and franchisee's don't keep records that far back even IF the Mcdonalds she worked at still exists today. Many jobs Ive had are for businesses that no longer exist.  I have a degree in Electronics from a school that no longer exists. It happens. Apparently from what Ive seen , Trump ate there and fed his crew then left without paying for the food or lost sales during the photo op. Sounds normal for him. Back to the media  by far the majority of the media didn't report on these facts simply showed footage of trump handing food out and in a heavily edited clip cooked fries. The actual footage showed the stable genius unable to perform the action without being walked through it twice and still screwing it up.Do we hear about that? ..no. I will give NBC props when they aired the Arnold Palmer story(who according to his daughter Peg couldn't stand trump). 

these are just a few of the recent things since I could write about things like this for months without running out of material. 

How did we get here?